Perhaps just save your files on a dvd and just format?
Perhaps just save your files on a dvd and just format?
You cannot hope to build a better world without improving the individuals. To that end each of us must work for his own improvement, and at the same time share a general responsibility for all humanity, our particular duty being to aid those to whom we think we can be most useful. -Marie Curie
Makes sense to me.
Peace.
Oh you do not understand how much I despise starting a new computing experience.
No number of files or settings saved could be adequate.
Finnish would not suffice Kraco. Thank you though.
If it's not Isuzu-chan Mii~
Sorry Buff, I only use Win 7 Pro versions. I'll look for a HP 64-bit key and see if I can get that iso link.
“For God will not permit that we shall know what is to come... those who by some sorcery or by some dream might come to pierce the veil that lies so darkly over all that is before them may serve by just that vision to cause that God should wrench the world from its heading and set it upon another course altogether and then where stands the sorcerer? Where the dreamer and his dream?”
If you go the Jack Sparrow route you could save lots of time and headaches. You could repair system with the original disc and then download and apply SP1. Is exactly what a SP1 system does If Im correct. Installs the base system then applies patch. Only saves you the download process.
The path of excess leads to the tower of wisdom
It doesn't allow you to do that though if you're doing a repair install, because after the SP1 update the files have changed, and so has the operating system's version number. I've got the original disc and it doesn't let me do this.
I've looked on alternative sites as well, and the ones I trust all have pre-activated versions whereas I'm looking for an untampered one. I could have saved all this headache by not deleting the SP1 rollback files (900MB or so), but they were gone a long time ago.
I back up weekly, but it seems that Sunday's copy was already too late (and I only have space for one copy, so I only keep the latest one).
If it's not Isuzu-chan Mii~
Im not completely sure what pre-activated means but I found lots of torrents of the w7 ultimate sp1 (wich I believe include all versions, from home basic to enterprise) in jack sparrow bay. I remember using one years ago (4 or 5) in my old rig without any problems.Originally Posted by Buffalobiian
The path of excess leads to the tower of wisdom
Pre-activated means that the disc has been tweaked such that upon install Windows already activates itself as genuine (as opposed to install-then-apply-crack), which means that the files have been tampered with.
I've found a mirror site here that seems to be a legit as it can be from a non-Microsoft source, and testing it on a virtual machine seems successful. I'll be testing it for real soon enough.
http://mirror.corenoc.de/digitalrivercontent.net/
If it's not Isuzu-chan Mii~
For 200ish dollars, is this a good deal?
Dell 780 Core 2 Duo 3.0 GHZ
4 GB DDR 3 1600 MHZ
320 GB Sata
4 GB VIDEO GT 630 MSI DDR3
Objective: To play Final Fantasy XIV without ripping my eyes out on the lowest setting, I REALLY don`t care about graphics quality, only smoothness.
You cannot hope to build a better world without improving the individuals. To that end each of us must work for his own improvement, and at the same time share a general responsibility for all humanity, our particular duty being to aid those to whom we think we can be most useful. -Marie Curie
It's a computer that has all of that right? Not just 4 parts for $200
(Just clarifying. I'll let the American guys handle question regarding their own market)
If it's not Isuzu-chan Mii~
A computer that has all of that.
You cannot hope to build a better world without improving the individuals. To that end each of us must work for his own improvement, and at the same time share a general responsibility for all humanity, our particular duty being to aid those to whom we think we can be most useful. -Marie Curie
Dumb question.
Fact: physical therapist assistant shall practice under the supervision of a licensed physical therapist who is responsible for and participates in a patient's care. This supervision requires the licensed physical therapist to make an onsite visit to the client at least once for every six visits made by the assistant or once every 2 weeks, whichever occurs first.
True or false: A supervising physical therapist must make an onsite visit to patients at least once for every 10 visits made by a physical therapy student.
Side note: For all intents and purpose, a student and an assistant are considered the same.
You cannot hope to build a better world without improving the individuals. To that end each of us must work for his own improvement, and at the same time share a general responsibility for all humanity, our particular duty being to aid those to whom we think we can be most useful. -Marie Curie
True.
The supervisor must visit at least once every 6 visits. By the time a student has made 10 visits, the supervisor must therefore have dropped by once or more.
The two-week rule only comes into effect when you don't clock up 6 visits by two weeks, which means the client gets their supervisor visit before the 6th visit. Again, this means they've had one by Visit 10.
I'm answering this from a multiple choice paper perspective. If there's a better answer (one that says "Every 6th visit"), I'd pick that.
If it's not Isuzu-chan Mii~
Let`s take the following example.
A supervisor visits the patient after 8 visits by the assistant/student. According to the law, this is wrong, but according to the true/false statement, this is fine, therefore the answer should be false?
You cannot hope to build a better world without improving the individuals. To that end each of us must work for his own improvement, and at the same time share a general responsibility for all humanity, our particular duty being to aid those to whom we think we can be most useful. -Marie Curie
It's consistent with the true/false statement but doesn't meet the minimum requirements. It's not acceptable.
If it's not Isuzu-chan Mii~
I dunno if Im understanding this.
The supervisor can (must) do (at least 1) an onsite visit since stundets visit 0 to 6. If he hasnt done the visit in that lapse by the 7th student visit it would be at fault.
Thats how I read it. In the 10 visits case he must have done an onsite, at least, before the 7th student visit.
And I would say that the statment is false. Cause it may happen that by th 10th visit he only needs one visit, but by the 20th (2 10 visits) he must have gone onsite 3 times at least. Thus breaking the 1 visit per 10 visits.
The path of excess leads to the tower of wisdom
That is correct Endort. The statement is not true for successive events.
If it's not Isuzu-chan Mii~
Hey all, I have the Avermedia Dark Crystal C027 capture card installed in my Win7 64 PC. I have my cable box connected via HDMI to a splitter/HDCP stripper that then connects to the C027 HDMI-in port. My PC video/audio output (from a GTX770 with the latest Geforce drivers) goes to a Denon AVR-X1000 receiver which then feeds signal to my TV and HT speakers. I'm using the latest software and drivers (AVer MediaCenter 1.7.9.91, Driver v1.54.x.82). I can see video in the [capture] mode, but no audio. Also when I capture some video and then play it back, there is no audio captured.
Some troubleshooting:
I have the capture [configure sound] option set to stereo mix (which is enabled and default recording device), and in the [Windows sound control panel] I have the recording device defaulted to stereo mix with [listen] checked and the Denon device selected. Windows/YT/etc sounds play fine through the Denon, but no audio at all when viewing the cable box in the [capture] mode with this capture card.
Anyone have any ideas? Thanks,
“For God will not permit that we shall know what is to come... those who by some sorcery or by some dream might come to pierce the veil that lies so darkly over all that is before them may serve by just that vision to cause that God should wrench the world from its heading and set it upon another course altogether and then where stands the sorcerer? Where the dreamer and his dream?”
I'm looking at 10" tablets and am looking for opinions.
I'm particularly looking for anyone who's switched between ipads / MS surfaces / android tablets and have tried everything. My eco system is Windows PCs and android phones.
It'll be mainly a portable media player, so media compatibility is important. It won't be used for streaming. It's mostly for downloaded file playback. Being able to simply copy/paste files over instead of using propitiatory apps/import functions is a plus.
If it's not Isuzu-chan Mii~
A Surface Pro is a respectable PC, so it will play anything. But they're a bit pricey. Even a regular Surface 3 is a Windows 10 computer. Network the device and copy-paste over sharing. You wouldn't even have to plug it in to transfer files.
Aussie price gouging is a factor for you, but otherwise I don't know why you'd consider an alternative if you're after multimedia compatibility and Surfaces are one of your options.
I had luck with Archos tablets back in the day if you're dead-set on android (their proprietary media apps played anything), but their overall quality is terrible these days. Kindles can't play mkvs with out conversions before uploading, and other android tablets are hit or miss based on their hardware's ability to keep up with something like VLC for Android.
Last edited by Ryllharu; Sat, 03-26-2016 at 08:01 AM.
Posting Permissions
Reply With Quote
